Dark Patterns, Founders & Funding

The digital economy operates on a fundamental tension: the pursuit of frictionless, user-centric experiences often clashes with the relentless, data-driven mandate for hyper-growth. This conflict has given rise to a pervasive and insidious phenomenon known as "dark patterns" deceptive user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) designs carefully crafted to manipulate consumers into actions they did not intend. Ranging from sneaking unwanted items into online shopping carts to making subscription cancellations nearly impossible, have become a global standard for boosting short-term commercial metrics. Globally, companies from tech giants like Amazon and Microsoft to countless smaller players have systematically employed these tactics, leveraging sophisticated A/B testing and psychological principles to drive conversions, revenue, and data collection at the expense of user autonomy.

In India, the proliferation of dark patterns has reached a critical point, with a significant surge in consumer complaints prompting one of the world's most robust regulatory responses. The government's "Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns, 2023" explicitly outlaws 13 specific deceptive practices, classifying them as unfair trade practices under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, and prescribing severe penalties for non-compliance. Despite this strong legal framework, the use of these tactics by major e-commerce, food delivery, and ride-hailing platforms remains rampant, highlighting a significant gap between legislation and enforcement.

We also delve into the "other side of the coin," examining the systemic pressures that compel startup founders to adopt these methods. The analysis reveals that the venture capital (VC) and private equity (PE) funding model is a primary catalyst. The rigid focus on specific, aggressive growth metrics such as month-over-month revenue growth, customer lifetime value (LTV) to acquisition cost (CAC) ratios, and low churn rates creates an environment where dark patterns are seen not as ethical failures, but as rational, effective tools for survival and securing the next funding round. The pressure of the typical 10-year fund lifecycle, which necessitates a rapid and lucrative exit, further incentivizes short-term optimization over long-term user trust.

While investor pressure creates a powerful incentive for deceptive practices, this report concludes that long-term viability and market leadership hinge on building a foundation of transparency and ethical design. A counter-movement is emerging, with some investors recognizing the material risks of poor governance and unethical practices. The path forward requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders: founders and designers must champion ethics as a strategic advantage, investors must evolve their evaluation criteria beyond pure growth, and regulators must ensure that enforcement is as potent as legislation. Ultimately, the most resilient and valuable companies will be those that reject the false dichotomy between growth and ethics, understanding that sustainable success is built on genuine value creation, not manipulation.

The term "dark patterns" was first coined in 2010 by UK-based UX designer Harry Brignull to describe a user interface that has been deliberately engineered to deceive users into performing actions they would not otherwise choose, such as purchasing unwanted insurance or signing up for recurring bills.¹ This definition distinguishes these practices from simple design flaws or anti-patterns, which are common mistakes. Dark patterns are not errors; they are intentional, manipulative tricks embedded in software that subvert user autonomy and exploit cognitive vulnerabilities.² Their purpose is to mislead users into unintended consequences, including financial loss, sharing of personal data, or agreeing to unfavorable terms.¹

The effectiveness of dark patterns lies in their sophisticated application of behavioral psychology. They leverage well-documented cognitive biases to guide user behavior toward outcomes that benefit the business.² For example, by creating a false sense of scarcity, a platform can tap into a user's scarcity bias. By showing a discounted price next to a higher original price, it leverages the anchoring bias. By suggesting that many other people are buying an item, it exploits the principle of social proof.² This manipulation is often subtle, leaving users feeling as though they themselves made a mistake, with many thinking, "how did I not spot that!" rather than recognizing the deceptive nature of the interface itself.¹

The proliferation and increasing sophistication of these techniques are not accidental. They are a direct result of the widespread adoption of powerful data analytics and optimization methodologies within the digital product development lifecycle. The rise of e-commerce and the "attention economy" created immense commercial incentives to influence user behavior.⁵ Simultaneously, tools like A/B testing and deep user analytics became standard practice, allowing companies to measure the precise impact of minute design changes on key performance indicators (KPIs) such as conversion rates, user engagement, and revenue.² This created a powerful feedback loop: a company could test a slightly more ambiguous turn of phrase (a "Trick Question") or a more urgent-sounding banner ("False Urgency") and see an immediate, quantifiable increase in sales.² Consequently, dark patterns are not merely the product of malicious intent; they are often the logical and profitable outcome of applying powerful optimization tools without a corresponding ethical framework. The knowledge of applied psychology, once the domain of a privileged few, is now commonplace and weaponized for commercial gain.²

Dark patterns manifest in numerous forms, each designed to exploit a different aspect of user psychology or behavior. Researchers have identified approximately 16 distinct types, which can be broadly categorized by the manipulative tactic employed.³

Obstruction Patterns (Making it hard to do what you want)

These patterns create friction to prevent users from taking actions that are undesirable for the business.

• Roach Motel / Hard to Cancel: This is one of the most notorious patterns, making it simple for a user to sign up for a service but extraordinarily difficult to cancel.⁸ The design is intended to trap users by exhausting their patience, thereby retaining them as subscribers.⁸ A globally recognized example is Amazon Prime's cancellation process, which historically required users to navigate through multiple pages, confront confusing language, and overcome several hurdles designed to dissuade them from unsubscribing.⁸ Similarly, some gym memberships require in-person visits or mailed requests to cancel, a physical-world equivalent of the digital roach motel.⁸ A more recent tech example involves ChatGPT, where opting out of personal data collection forces the user to also disable their entire chat history, coupling a desired action with an undesirable consequence.³

• Obstruction: This pattern deliberately makes a process more difficult to discourage a certain user choice. For example, a mobile app or website might become intentionally slower or less responsive if a user opts out of data processing, frustrating them into accepting the default settings.³

Sneaking Patterns (Adding things without your knowledge)

These patterns add items or enroll users in services without their explicit and informed consent.

• Sneak into Basket: This classic tactic involves adding extra items to a user's shopping cart without their direct action, often through a hard-to-spot, pre-ticked checkbox.¹ While the intention can sometimes seem benign, such as when Dutch Royal Airlines automatically adds a carbon offset fee to a flight's price, it subverts the user's conscious decision-making process.⁹

• Forced Continuity: This pattern occurs when a company transitions a user from a free trial to a paid subscription automatically and without adequate prior notification.¹ Many streaming services and fitness apps are guilty of this practice. Users of Adobe Creative Cloud, for instance, have reported being unexpectedly charged for annual plans after a trial period ended, which they did not intend to continue.⁸

Urgency & Scarcity Patterns (Pressuring you to act now)

These patterns create artificial pressure to rush a user's decision-making process.

• False Urgency / FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out): This involves creating a misleading sense of scarcity or a limited time window to compel a quick purchase.¹ Online travel agencies and e-commerce sites frequently use this tactic, displaying messages like "Only 2 rooms left!" or "30 others are looking at this right now".¹ While this information can be genuinely useful to a shopper if true, it becomes a dark pattern when the claims are false or exaggerated to manipulate the user's fear of missing out.²

Misdirection & Deception Patterns (Tricking you into an action)

These patterns use trickery, vague language, or visual distraction to mislead the user.

• Bait and Switch: This occurs when a user is promised one outcome but receives something entirely different.⁸ The most infamous example involved Microsoft's Windows 10 upgrade pop-up. Many users who clicked the "Close" (X) button, logically expecting to dismiss the prompt, instead found that their action had triggered the installation process, betraying user trust and damaging the company's credibility.¹

• Disguised Ads: This pattern camouflages advertisements to look like native user interface elements or genuine content, tricking users into engaging with them.¹ A common example is the use of fake "Download" buttons on software or file-sharing websites, which redirect users to ads or malware instead of providing the intended file.⁸

• Misdirection: This tactic uses visual hierarchy to draw a user's attention toward a preferred option while obscuring another critical detail.⁸ Airlines frequently employ this by highlighting low base fares in large, bold fonts while hiding significant taxes and ancillary fees in fine print, only to be revealed at the final checkout stage.¹

• Trick Wording / Trick Questions: This pattern uses deliberately confusing language, often involving double negatives or inverted logic, to trick users into making an unintended choice.⁸ A classic example is a checkbox accompanied by the text, "Check this box to opt out of receiving marketing emails." This goes against the established convention where checking a box signifies opting in, thus fooling users who skim the text.¹ Facebook has also been cited for using unclear button language, such as "Use this activity," which is far less transparent than a straightforward "Agree to Data Collection".³

Shaming Patterns (Using emotional manipulation)

These patterns leverage guilt or shame to influence user decisions.

• Confirm-shaming: This involves phrasing an opt-out choice in a way that shames or guilt-trips the user into reconsidering.¹ For instance, instead of a neutral "No, thanks" on a newsletter subscription pop-up, the button might read, "No thanks, I don't want amazing deals in my inbox" or "No, I prefer to pay full price." This wording makes the alternative seem more desirable and nudges the user toward the company's preferred outcome.¹

The following table provides a consolidated overview of these manipulative techniques, serving as a quick-reference guide to the global landscape of deceptive design.

Table 1: Global Dark Pattern Taxonomy

The proliferation of dark patterns is not merely a global phenomenon; it has become deeply entrenched within India's rapidly expanding digital ecosystem. The issue has reached such a scale that it has triggered a "significant surge" in consumer complaints filed with the National Consumer Helpline, prompting direct government intervention.¹¹ The problem is systemic and widespread, affecting nearly every major digital platform operating in the country.¹³

Independent analysis corroborates the scale of the issue. A study conducted by the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) revealed that an alarming 52 out of 53 of India's top applications were utilizing dark patterns to deceive their users.¹⁵ Another comprehensive survey found that 98% of popular Indian apps employed at least one deceptive design pattern, with ride-hailing apps averaging three distinct instances per app.¹⁶ These figures demonstrate that the use of manipulative design is not an exception but the norm in the Indian market, creating a landscape where consumer trust is systematically undermined.

The abstract problem of dark patterns becomes concrete when examining its application by specific companies across India's key digital sectors. User complaints, media reports, and regulatory notices provide a wealth of evidence detailing how these tactics are deployed.

This sector, built on speed and convenience, is rife with dark patterns designed to inflate transaction values and lock in users.

• Zepto: The quick-commerce unicorn has faced numerous accusations from users and has been issued a notice by the government.¹⁷ A primary complaint involves Drip Pricing, where the final bill is inflated by a host of hidden charges, including a 'Rain Fee', 'Cash Handling Fee', 'Item Handling Cost', and 'Small Cart Fee', which are not clearly disclosed upfront.¹⁸ Another widely reported dark pattern is a misleading "Free Cash" promotion. Users report that when they apply this "free cash," a portion is deceptively used to cover the delivery fee, even if a separate free delivery coupon has already been applied, thus diminishing the actual discount.²⁰ Furthermore, Zepto has been accused of
  Basket Sneaking by automatically adding its 'Zepto Daily Pass' subscription to users' carts, requiring them to manually opt-out.¹²

• Zomato & Swiggy: These food delivery giants have also been central figures in the dark patterns discourse.¹³ Both have been implicated in Basket Sneaking for automatically adding charitable donations (e.g., Zomato's "Feed India" foundation) to a user's bill via a pre-ticked box, a practice that subverts explicit consent.²¹ They also engage in Drip Pricing and Interface Interference by quietly increasing delivery or platform fees when a user applies a discount coupon, with the increased fee often displayed in small, grey text while the "savings" are highlighted prominently.²² Zomato is also cited for a deceptive Couponing tactic, where a loudly advertised "Up to 50% Off" offer is subject to a very low absolute cap (e.g., ₹50), making the actual discount negligible on larger orders.²² Both platforms are also accused of Nagging through persistent, repetitive pop-ups pushing their respective membership programs.²²

India's major ride-hailing platforms have been a focal point of regulatory scrutiny for their use of manipulative designs. Both Ola and Uber have received notices from the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA).¹⁷

• Uber & Ola: A common complaint against both platforms is Basket Sneaking, where a small insurance fee is automatically added to the fare with a pre-selected option, requiring users to actively opt-out.¹⁶ They are also accused of creating Subscription Traps and employing Interface Interference by designing deliberately complex and cumbersome processes for cancelling memberships (like Uber One) or seeking refunds, often burying these options deep within the app's menus.¹⁶ A particularly contentious practice is the "advance tipping" feature, which prompts users to add a tip before the ride to get a "faster pickup." The government has labeled this an "unethical" practice that amounts to a form of Forced Action, as it pressures users to pay more for what should be a standard level of service.²³ Users also report widespread Drip Pricing, where the final fare charged is significantly higher than the initial estimate, and there are allegations of Differential Pricing, where fares for identical routes differ based on the user's device, such as an iPhone versus an Android phone.¹⁶

Major e-commerce and travel aggregators, including both domestic and international players, have been found to engage in deceptive practices.

• Flipkart & Amazon: Both companies have been held liable in consumer court rulings. In one case, Flipkart was found to have engaged in Bait and Switch tactics and provided misleading assurances about its products.¹⁵ In another case, Amazon was found guilty of a dark pattern where a search for a premium brand ("Marc Jacobs") prominently displayed a sponsored result for a different, lower-quality brand ("Marc Cotton"), manipulating the consumer into an unintended purchase.¹⁵ This practice of using sponsored ads to misdirect search intent is a form of Disguised Advertisement.

• MakeMyTrip: The online travel aggregator has been accused of using Confirm Shaming in its insurance purchase flow, with opt-out text like "let me risk it," designed to guilt users into buying the add-on.²¹ More significantly, users on platforms like Reddit have detailed a form of Drip Pricing or Interface Interference where applying a bank discount coupon causes the platform's own "convenience fee" to increase. This effectively claws back a portion of the discount offered by the bank, deceiving the user about the true value of the promotion.²⁶ The credibility of these claims was bolstered when a user claiming to be an ex-employee of the company stated they had personally coded such dark patterns to sell insurance.²⁶

In response to the escalating consumer complaints and the pervasive use of deceptive designs, the Indian government has enacted one of the world's most specific and stringent legal frameworks against dark patterns. On November 30, 2023, the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA), exercising its powers under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, issued the "Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns, 2023".²⁷

A critical aspect of these guidelines is the legal classification of dark patterns as a form of "unfair trade practice" as defined under Section 2(47) of the Consumer Protection Act.⁴ This designation moves the issue from a matter of design ethics to a violation of consumer law, making it subject to legal action and penalties. The guidelines apply broadly to all platforms, sellers, and advertisers offering goods or services in India, including foreign entities.⁴

The CCPA guidelines explicitly prohibit 13 specified dark patterns, providing clear definitions and illustrations for each: False Urgency, Basket Sneaking, Confirm Shaming, Forced Action, Subscription Trap, Interface Interference, Bait and Switch, Drip Pricing, Disguised Advertisement, Nagging, Trick Wording, SaaS Billing, and Rogue Malwares.¹⁰

The enforcement mechanism is robust, at least on paper. Contravention of the guidelines can attract significant penalties under the Consumer Protection Act, including imprisonment for a term up to two years and a fine up to ten lakh rupees for a first offense. A subsequent offense can lead to imprisonment up to five years and a fine up to fifty lakh rupees.⁴ In cases of ambiguity, the CCPA's interpretation is considered final.⁴ As part of its enforcement strategy, the CCPA has issued hundreds of notices to companies for unfair trade practices, with a subset specifically targeting dark patterns.¹¹ Furthermore, the government has issued an advisory requiring all e-commerce platforms to conduct self-audits within a three-month period and submit self-declarations of compliance, aiming to foster a more transparent digital ecosystem.²³

Complementing the government's actions, the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI), a self-regulatory body, has also taken steps to address the issue within advertising. ASCI released its own guidelines focusing on four key dark patterns prevalent in advertising: Drip Pricing, Bait and Switch, False Urgency, and Disguised Ads.³¹ These guidelines require, for example, that all non-optional taxes and fees be included in the upfront price and that ads disguised as editorial content be clearly labeled.³¹

The following table connects the 13 dark patterns officially banned by the Indian government to specific, real-world examples from the Indian market, illustrating the direct link between the regulation and the practices it aims to curb.

Table 2: India's 13 Banned Dark Patterns and Corresponding Local Examples

The cultural and methodological framework of "growth hacking" serves as a crucial bridge between the pressures of the VC world and the implementation of dark patterns. Growth hacking is defined by its emphasis on rapid, data-driven experimentation using techniques like A/B testing to identify and scale the most effective tactics for business growth.⁶ This process, focused on optimizing the entire customer lifecycle (often visualized through the AARRR "pirate metrics" model: Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Referral, Revenue), is fundamentally agnostic to ethics.⁴³ It is designed to find what "works" to move a metric.

This methodology provides the perfect toolkit for a founder under intense VC pressure. The process of testing a new, more transparent onboarding flow is identical to the process of testing a manipulative Confirm-shaming message to reduce subscription cancellations. The data will simply show which version was more "effective" at achieving the desired KPI.² When a founder is tasked with reducing churn by 2% month-over-month to secure their next funding round, the temptation to deploy a "growth hack" that is, in reality, a Subscription Trap becomes immense. The growth hacking process validates its effectiveness in raw numbers, often divorced from any ethical consideration. In this context, the VC pressure provides the powerful motive, and the growth hacking methodology provides the effective means and opportunity, creating a perfect storm for the proliferation of dark patterns in the startup ecosystem.

The conflict between aggressive growth mandates and ethical design is one of the defining challenges of the modern digital economy. While the pressures on founders are undeniable, a sustainable path forward requires a fundamental reframing of the issue. Rather than viewing ethics as a constraint on growth, stakeholders must recognize it as a prerequisite for building resilient, trustworthy, and ultimately more valuable enterprises.

Treating ethics as a "luxury problem" to be addressed only after achieving product-market fit is a critical strategic error.⁵ An ethical approach to design is not merely about regulatory compliance or moral posturing; it is a strategic asset that confers a significant competitive advantage.

Ethical design, characterized by transparency, fairness, and respect for user autonomy, is the most effective way to build genuine user trust and loyalty.⁴⁴ When users feel that their privacy is respected and their needs are prioritized, they are more likely to engage positively with a product and remain loyal to the brand over the long term.⁴⁴ This directly impacts the very metrics that investors value. High trust leads to lower customer churn and higher Net Promoter Scores (NPS), which in turn increases Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) a cornerstone of sustainable unit economics.³⁶

Conversely, the short-term gains offered by dark patterns are often a Faustian bargain. While they may boost immediate conversion rates or transaction values, they systematically erode user trust.⁷ This erosion manifests as customer complaints, negative public sentiment, brand damage, and ultimately, increased regulatory scrutiny all of which represent significant and material business risks.⁷ Founders and designers must recognize that every decision, from the very first wireframe, carries implicit values and determines whether a user is being supported or controlled.⁵ Opting for the latter is a short-sighted strategy that mortgages long-term viability for fleeting gains.

The "growth at all costs" mentality that has long dominated the venture capital landscape is beginning to face a necessary correction. There is a growing recognition within the investor community that this approach carries substantial risks. High-profile, catastrophic failures of companies like FTX and Theranos, which were characterized by a near-total absence of governance and ethical oversight, have served as stark warnings.⁴⁰ These events have demonstrated that a lack of ethical perspective is not just a social issue but a critical financial liability.

In response, a counter-movement focused on responsible scaling is gaining traction. Investors are increasingly incorporating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria into their due diligence processes.⁴⁵ For a technology startup, the 'S' (Social) and 'G' (Governance) factors are particularly material. The 'Social' component includes how a company treats its customers, respects their data privacy, and avoids manipulative practices. The 'Governance' component relates to establishing proper oversight, transparency, and accountability structures, such as a formal Board of Directors.⁴⁰

This shift is driven by two primary factors. First, it is a form of sophisticated risk management. Investors are realizing that companies with weak ethical frameworks and poor governance are more likely to face regulatory action, public backlash, and ultimately, failure.⁴⁰ Second, there is a growing belief that companies built on a foundation of ethics and sustainability are more resilient, attract better talent, and are better positioned for long-term value creation.⁴⁵ As one venture capitalist noted, ethical AI isn't just a box to check; it's a mindset that can set a startup apart in the market.⁴⁵

Navigating the complex interplay of growth pressure and ethical design requires a concerted and proactive effort from all key stakeholders. The following recommendations offer a strategic framework for fostering a more balanced and sustainable digital ecosystem.

• Embed Ethics from Day One: Ethics should not be a reactive compliance task or an afterthought. It must be a core value embedded in the company's mission statement, business plan, and product development process from the very beginning.⁵ Founders must anticipate ethical tensions and create a culture where these issues can be openly debated and resolved.⁴⁹

• Advocate with Data and Business Logic: Designers must learn to frame ethical arguments in the language of business outcomes. Instead of simply stating, "This dark pattern is unethical," the argument should be, "While this design may increase short-term sign-ups by 5%, our user testing shows it generates significant frustration, which will likely increase our 90-day churn rate and damage our NPS score, ultimately harming our LTV." This approach connects ethical design directly to the metrics that stakeholders care about.⁵⁰

• Establish a "Moral Compass" and Make Trade-offs Visible: Founders and their teams should develop a clear set of principles to guide decision-making when growth and ethics conflict. This involves making conscious trade-offs visible and taking responsibility for them, rather than defaulting to the path of least resistance or greatest short-term gain.⁵ This creates consistency and allows the team to focus on execution rather than renegotiating values at every turn.⁵

• Prioritize and Mandate Governance: Investors have a responsibility to insist on strong governance structures as a condition of investment. This includes mandating the establishment of a formal Board of Directors with independent members to provide oversight and ensure accountability.⁴⁰ This is not an impediment to a founder's "dream" but a crucial mechanism for ensuring it is realized sustainably.

• Redefine "Growth" and Scrutinize the "How": The definition of a successful investment should evolve beyond "growth at all costs." VCs should prioritize sustainable, capital-efficient growth. During due diligence and board meetings, they must scrutinize how metrics are being achieved, not just the top-line numbers. A sudden drop in churn, for example, should prompt the question: "Did we improve the product, or did we just make it harder to cancel?"

• Integrate Ethical Due Diligence as Material Risk Management: VCs should formally integrate an assessment of a startup's ethical framework into their investment process. This includes evaluating the company's approach to user data, its design practices, and the founder's own ethical perspective. Viewing these factors as material to long-term risk and resilience is not just responsible investing; it is smart investing.⁴⁷

• Strengthen and Publicize Enforcement: The gap between strong legislation, like India's CCPA guidelines, and on-the-ground compliance must be closed. Regulators need to pursue more aggressive and highly visible enforcement actions. The penalties for using dark patterns must be perceived as a real, tangible threat that consistently exceeds the potential profits, thereby shifting the economic calculation for companies.

• Foster Continuous Collaboration and Adaptation: Deceptive design is not static; it evolves as technology and user behaviors change. Regulators must continue to foster collaboration between industry, academia, and consumer organizations to identify, analyze, and adapt to new forms of dark patterns as they emerge, ensuring that legal frameworks remain relevant and effective.¹⁴

The digital landscape is at a crossroads. The path of least resistance, paved with the instant gratification of dark patterns and fueled by the immense pressure of the venture capital growth engine, leads toward an ecosystem where user trust is a disposable commodity. This approach, while demonstrably profitable in the short term, is fundamentally unsustainable. It invites regulatory backlash, erodes brand loyalty, and ultimately builds businesses on a foundation of sand.

The alternative path one of ethical design and responsible scaling is more demanding but infinitely more durable. It requires founders to possess a strong moral compass and the courage to prioritize long-term value over short-term metrics. It requires designers to be vigilant advocates for the user, armed with the business acumen to translate ethical principles into strategic advantages. Most critically, it requires investors to evolve, recognizing that the most profound risks lie not in missing out on a quarter of hyper-growth, but in backing companies that lack the governance and ethical integrity to last.

The pressures for growth are real and systemic, but they do not constitute a license for deception. The most resilient, valuable, and defensible companies of the future will be those that reject the false dichotomy between growth and ethics. They will understand that in an increasingly transparent world, the ultimate competitive advantage is not a clever trick or a manipulative design, but the unwavering trust of their users. Building that trust is the hardest, yet most important, metric of all.

Works cited

1. What are dark patterns in UX? All you need to know, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.uxdesigninstitute.com/blog/what-are-dark-patterns-in-ux/

2. Bringing Dark Patterns to Light. Transcript of the speech I gave at the ..., accessed July 24, 2025, https://harrybr.medium.com/bringing-dark-patterns-to-light-d86f24224ebf

3. 9 Dark Pattern Examples to Look Out For | Osano, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.osano.com/articles/dark-pattern-examples

4. Dark Patterns Outlawed: Online Platforms to Watch Out | SCC Times, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/02/27/dark-patterns-outlawed-online-platforms-to-watch-out/

5. Startups and Ethics: A Fine Line. How founders can make ethical ..., accessed July 24, 2025, https://cosmicgold.medium.com/startups-and-ethics-a-fine-line-97433894057f

6. What is Growth Hacking? - GrowthHackers.com, accessed July 24, 2025, https://growthhackers.com/growth-hacking/what-is-growth-hacking/

7. Why dark patterns are more effective than you think | by Daniel Mitev | Bootcamp - Medium, accessed July 24, 2025, https://medium.com/design-bootcamp/why-dark-patterns-are-more-effective-than-you-think-f9a5fc2f4c67

8. 18 Dark Pattern Examples (and How to Avoid Them) - Eleken, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.eleken.co/blog-posts/dark-patterns-examples

9. 14 Dark Patterns Examples in Design You'll Want to Avoid Tutorial | Uxcel, accessed July 24, 2025, https://app.uxcel.com/tutorials/14-dark-patterns-examples-in-design-youll-want-to-avoid-419

10. Big relief for consumers suffering loss due to dark patterns; Govt ..., accessed July 24, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/wealth/save/big-relief-for-consumers-suffering-loss-due-to-dark-patterns-govt-asks-all-e-commerce-sites-to-take-steps-to-eliminate-all-dark-patterns/articleshow/121692649.cms

11. India Asks eCommerce Platforms to Remove 'Dark Patterns' That Deceive Customers, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.pymnts.com/news/ecommerce/2025/india-asks-ecommerce-platforms-to-remove-dark-patterns-that-deceive-customers/

12. Centre Asks Ecom Players To Proactively Eliminate Dark Patterns, accessed July 24, 2025, https://inc42.com/buzz/centre-asks-ecommerce-players-to-proactively-eliminate-dark-patterns/

13. What are dark patterns & why are they under government scrutiny?, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.newindianexpress.com/xplore/2025/Jun/07/what-are-dark-patterns-why-are-they-under-government-scrutiny-2

14. India reminds Big Tech it prohibits use of dark patterns - The Register, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/29/india_nonetoosubtly_reminds_big_tech/

15. Dark Patterns and its influence on Indian consumer behaviour, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.barandbench.com/view-point/navigating-deception-dark-patterns-and-its-influence-on-indian-consumer-behaviour

16. Tackling dark patterns in mobility apps, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/tackling-dark-patterns-in-mobility-apps

17. Govt issues notices to 11 firms including Zepto, Uber for using dark ..., accessed July 24, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/govt-issues-notices-to-11-firms-including-zepto-uber-for-using-dark-patterns-to-sway-consumers-warns-action/articleshow/121470779.cms

18. Zepto dark patterns : r/FuckZepto - Reddit, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/FuckZepto/comments/1ks2m85/zepto_dark_patterns/

19. Nearly 10000 Redditors accuse Zepto of shady app practices: 'Hold Zepto accountable', accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.hindustantimes.com/trending/reddit-community-on-zepto-dark-patterns-grows-to-nearly-10-000-users-customers-slam-hidden-charges-fake-mrps-101748850597108.html

20. Zepto "free cash" dark pattern : r/FuckZepto - Reddit, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/FuckZepto/comments/1kf73oh/zepto_free_cash_dark_pattern/

21. India's Ban on Dark Patterns: A Step Towards Fair E-commerce Practices - UI Designer, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.vivinrichard.com/post/india-s-ban-on-dark-patterns-a-step-towards-fair-e-commerce-practices

22. Dark Patterns: The Gray Area of UX! - DAIOM, accessed July 24, 2025, https://daiom.in/dark-patterns-the-gray-area-of-ux-blog/

23. Centre Orders E-Commerce Platforms To Self-Audit To Identify "Dark Patterns" - NDTV, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/centre-orders-e-commerce-platforms-to-self-audit-to-identify-dark-patterns-8612469

24. Ola, Uber, Rapido are being slammed for unfair practice - India Today, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/why-users-feel-uber-rapido-ola-advance-tipping-unfair-exploitation-surge-pricing-cabs-auto-bike-heres-more-2732002-2025-05-30

25. 8 in 10 app taxi users report dark patterns like bait-and-switch, others - Business Standard, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.business-standard.com/industry/news/8-in-10-app-taxi-users-report-dark-patterns-like-bait-and-switch-others-124122700795_1.html

26. MakeMyTrip and Goibibo are stealing from you : r/CreditCardsIndia, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/CreditCardsIndia/comments/1hxb8ln/makemytrip_and_goibibo_are_stealing_from_you/

27. E-Commerce Platforms Urged to Self-Audit and Eliminate Dark Patterns: Centre - PIB, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2146813

28. Why India Banned 13 Dark Patterns in Digital Design, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.ticworks.com/blog/why-india-banned-13-dark-patterns

29. E-commerce platforms must comply with guidelines on 'dark patterns': Food Minister Pralhad Joshi - The Economic Times, accessed July 24, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/industry/services/retail/e-commerce-platforms-must-comply-with-guidelines-on-dark-patterns-food-minister-pralhad-joshi/articleshow/121472820.cms

30. E-Commerce platforms told to self-audit and eliminate dark patterns in new consumer advisory - Storyboard18, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.storyboard18.com/how-it-works/e-commerce-platforms-told-to-self-audit-and-eliminate-dark-patterns-in-new-consumer-advisory-76047.htm

31. ASCI's new guidelines for 'Online Deceptive Design Patterns in Advertising' gets a thumbs-up - Pulp Strategy, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.pulpstrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ASCIs-new-guidelines-for-%E2%80%98Online-Deceptive-Design-Patterns-in-Advertising-gets-a-thumbs-up.pdf

32. Reshaping india dark pattern guidelines towards a better digital landscape - Lawrbit, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.lawrbit.com/article/reshaping-indias-dark-pattern-guidelines-towards-a-better-digital-landscape/

33. ASCI guidelines on deceptive design patterns in digital media advertisements, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.khaitanco.com/thought-leaderships/ASCI-guidelines-on-deceptive-design-patterns-in-digital-media-advertisements

34. Govt to hold talks with e-commerce platforms over dark patterns | Mint, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.livemint.com/industry/ecommerce-platforms-consumer-protection-online-shopping-dark-patterns-regulatory-violations-11748256287399.html

35. The Complete Guide to Venture Capital Fund Metrics - GoingVC, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.goingvc.com/post/the-complete-guide-to-venture-capital-fund-metrics

36. 15 Essential Startup Growth Metrics & KPIS to Track in 2025, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.f22labs.com/blogs/15-essential-startup-growth-metrics-kpis-to-track-in-2025/

37. What VC Founders Need To Know About Exit Pressure - Forbes, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/2025/02/26/what-vc-founders-need-to-know-about-exit-pressure/

38. Venture Capital Statistics: Trends, Metrics, and Benchmarks, accessed July 24, 2025, https://growthequityinterviewguide.com/venture-capital/venture-capital-resources/venture-capital-statistics

39. Ethical challenges Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in Startup Culture: A Guide for Entrepreneurs - FasterCapital, accessed July 24, 2025, https://fastercapital.com/content/Ethical-challenges-Navigating-Ethical-Dilemmas-in-Startup-Culture--A-Guide-for-Entrepreneurs.html

40. MB on VC: The Decline of Ethics in Venture Capital (and What to do ..., accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.bipventures.vc/news/the-decline-of-ethics-in-venture-capital-and-what-to-do-about-it

41. Profit over principles: unveiling the motivating factors behind dark ..., accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/jeim-08-2024-0409/full/html

42. Growth Hacking Examples, Definition and Strategies for Business Growth - Digital Leadership, accessed July 24, 2025, https://digitalleadership.com/blog/growth-hacking/

43. The Good Growth Hacking: Definition, How To Do It & Examples - CXL, accessed July 24, 2025, https://cxl.com/blog/growth-hacking-marketing/

44. Ethical design guide: principles, benefits and examples, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.future-processing.com/blog/ethical-design-principles-benefits-and-examples/

45. Investors bet on startups that bake ethics into their growth plans - Communitech, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.communitech.ca/resource-library/investors-bet-on-startups-that-bake-ethics-into-their-growth-plans.html

46. The Ethics of Venture Capital Investing - Number Analytics, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ethics-of-venture-capital-investing

47. Materiality Matters: How startups and VCs need to approach ESG - Maddyness UK, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.maddyness.com/uk/2024/10/17/materiality-matters-how-startups-and-vcs-need-to-approach-esg/

48. Venture Capital Crucial to Push for 'Ethical' AI and Tech Standards | INSEAD Knowledge, accessed July 24, 2025, https://knowledge.insead.edu/entrepreneurship/venture-capital-crucial-push-ethical-ai-and-tech-standards

49. A Good Start: Ethics for Entrepreneurs - Markkula Center for Applied ..., accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/a-good-start-ethics-for-entrepreneurs/

50. Ethics in times of growth design - DOC, accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.doc.cc/articles/ethics-in-times-of-growth-design